Best Llama 5 Hosting Providers in April 2026
Best Llama 5 Hosting Providers (April 2026)
Within 72 hours of Meta releasing Llama 5 on April 8, 2026, every major inference provider shipped API access. Here’s how they stack up in April 2026 on price, speed, variant coverage, and reliability.
Last verified: April 11, 2026
The Contenders
| Provider | Variants offered | Cheapest / fastest |
|---|---|---|
| Together AI | 8B, 70B, 200B, 600B | Balanced |
| Fireworks AI | 8B, 70B, 200B, 600B | Balanced |
| DeepInfra | 8B, 70B, 600B | Cheapest |
| Groq | 8B, 70B, 600B | Fastest |
| OpenRouter | All via upstream | Most providers |
| Replicate | 70B, 600B | Easiest UI |
Price Comparison (Llama 5 600B)
| Provider | Input $/M | Output $/M |
|---|---|---|
| DeepInfra | $2.70 | $5.40 |
| Together AI | $3.50 | $7.00 |
| Fireworks AI | $3.50 | $7.00 |
| OpenRouter | $3.20-$4.00 | $6.40-$8.00 |
| Groq | $4.00 | $8.00 |
| Replicate | $3.80 | $7.60 |
DeepInfra is 23% cheaper than Together/Fireworks on the flagship. For bulk workloads, that’s real money.
Speed Comparison (Tokens/sec, Llama 5 70B)
| Provider | Output speed | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Groq | 450-600 | LPU-based, single-stream only |
| Together | 70-90 | Good batching |
| Fireworks | 75-95 | Good batching |
| DeepInfra | 55-75 | Budget tier |
| Replicate | 40-60 | Slowest |
Groq’s LPU is in a different universe for latency-sensitive workloads. Everyone else is on H100 clusters and has similar single-stream speeds.
Context Window Support
Only a few providers serve the full 5M token context:
| Provider | Max context (Llama 5 600B) |
|---|---|
| Together AI | ✅ 5M |
| Fireworks AI | ✅ 5M |
| DeepInfra | 1M (capped) |
| Groq | 131K (capped) |
| Replicate | 256K (capped) |
| OpenRouter | Depends on upstream |
If you need the full 5M context, Together or Fireworks are your only options in April 2026.
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Together | Fireworks | DeepInfra | Groq |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenAI-compatible API | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Function calling | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ Limited | ✅ |
| JSON mode | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Vision (image input) | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Fine-tuning | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Dedicated endpoints | ✅ | ✅ | ⚠️ | ❌ |
| 5M context | ✅ | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
Who Should Use Each
Together AI — The Default
Best for: Most production workloads. Full variant coverage, full 5M context, fine-tuning, dedicated endpoints, strong reliability. Slightly more expensive than the cheapest but worth it for enterprise features.
Fireworks AI — The Close Second
Best for: Teams that want Together-like features with slightly better speed on some variants. Fine-tuning is excellent. Essentially tied with Together for most buyers.
DeepInfra — The Cost Champion
Best for: Cost-sensitive high-volume workloads that don’t need fine-tuning, vision, or the full 5M context. 23% cheaper than Together adds up fast.
Groq — The Speed Demon
Best for: Latency-sensitive interactive applications. Voice chat, real-time agents, anything where p50 latency matters more than cost. Capped context limits some use cases.
OpenRouter — The Aggregator
Best for: Teams who want to shop providers dynamically. Fallback and routing built in. Slight markup on most upstreams.
Replicate — The Prototyper
Best for: Quick experiments, web app demos, no-code prototypes. Not the fastest or cheapest, but easiest to get started.
Quick Picker
| Your priority | Pick |
|---|---|
| Lowest cost | DeepInfra |
| Fastest tokens/sec | Groq |
| Full 5M context | Together or Fireworks |
| Function calling + vision | Together or Fireworks |
| Fine-tuning | Together or Fireworks |
| Dynamic routing | OpenRouter |
| Easiest onboarding | Replicate |
The Takeaway
- For most production: Together AI or Fireworks AI
- For budget workloads: DeepInfra
- For interactive/realtime: Groq
- For experiments: Replicate
- For hedging: OpenRouter
All six providers had Llama 5 live within 72 hours of release. The open-weight ecosystem is faster than ever in April 2026.
Last verified: April 11, 2026