Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: Which Is Better 2026
The Short Answer
Claude Opus 5 ($5/$25) is the novel-reasoning and coding specialist — it leads most agentic/coding benchmarks and posts 96.0% SWE-bench Verified. GPT-5.6 Sol ($5/$30) is the terminal-and-browsing generalist. Same input price; Opus 5 is ~17% cheaper on output. Pick Opus 5 for hard problems and coding, Sol for browsing-heavy workflows.
Pricing (verified Aug 6, 2026)
| Model | Input /MTok | Output /MTok | Context |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5 | $5 | $25 | 1M (128K out) |
| GPT-5.6 Sol | $5 | $30 | — |
| GPT-5.6 Sol Ultra | $12.50 | $75 | — |
Same input cost; Opus 5 is ~17% cheaper on output. A 30K-in/5K-out task: Opus 5 ≈ $0.28, Sol ≈ $0.30.
Benchmarks: Where Each Wins
Claude Opus 5 leads (per llm-stats head-to-head):
- ARC-AGI-3 (novel reasoning)
- AutomationBench, BrowseComp (agentic/computer use)
- FrontierCode 1.1, OSWorld 2.0
- 96.0% SWE-bench Verified (coding)
GPT-5.6 Sol leads:
- DeepSWE 1.1
- HealthBench Professional
- Agents’ Last Exam — 53.6, a high across 55 professional fields
Caution: only SWE-bench Verified is reported by multiple vendors; treat single-vendor headline numbers as provisional.
Use-Case Split
- Genuinely novel problems, hard reasoning: Opus 5. Its ARC-AGI-3 and FrontierCode lead is the differentiator.
- Coding & computer use: Opus 5. Higher SWE-bench, wins OSWorld/BrowseComp, cheaper output.
- Terminal + browsing generalist agents: Sol. Its DeepSWE and Agents’ Last Exam strength shows in long-running professional workflows.
- Health/professional Q&A: Sol (HealthBench Professional).
Which Should You Pick?
- Default for coding and novel reasoning: Claude Opus 5 — better benchmarks and 17% cheaper output.
- Browsing-heavy, long-horizon professional agents: GPT-5.6 Sol.
- Budget everyday chat (not these): GPT-5.6 Luna ($0.20/$1.20) undercuts both, trading depth.
Watch Outs
- Benchmark non-equivalence — vendors publish different suites; don’t stack non-matching numbers.
- Sol Ultra premium — at $12.50/$75 it’s a different cost class; the base Sol is the fair comparison to Opus 5.
- Prices move — re-verify vendor pages before budgeting.
Verdict
For coding, novel reasoning, and computer use, Claude Opus 5 wins on both benchmarks and output price. For terminal + browsing generalist agent workflows, GPT-5.6 Sol edges ahead. Same input cost makes the choice about capability profile, not budget — and for most developers in 2026, that points to Opus 5.
Sources
- DataCamp — Claude Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol: datacamp.com
- llm-stats — Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol comparison: llm-stats.com
- OpenAI — GPT-5.6: openai.com
- Northell — Opus 5 vs GPT-5.5 vs Gemini 3.1 Pro: northell.design