Lyria 3.5 vs Eleven Music vs Suno: AI Music Compared
The Short Answer
| Lyria 3.5 | Eleven Music | Suno | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vendor | ElevenLabs | Suno | |
| Access | Gemini API (lyria-3.5, preview) | API | App / subscription |
| Price | $0.08 per song | $0.15 per minute | $10–$30 / month |
| Two-min track | $0.08 | $0.30 | subscription credits |
| Free tier | ❌ none | ❌ (paid API) | ✅ 50 credits/day |
| Output format | MP3, 44.1 kHz stereo | MP3 or WAV | MP3 |
| Exact duration | ❌ no parameter | ✅ music_length_ms | ❌ |
| Post-gen editing | ❌ single-turn | ✅ section-level | partial |
| Audio reference | ❌ (image input ✅) | ✅ ~30s reference | ✅ |
| Commercial terms | general API terms | explicit clearance | paid plans own output |
| Watermark | SynthID on every track | — | — |
The short version: Lyria 3.5 is the cheapest, Eleven Music is the most controllable, and Suno is the best human-facing tool. They are not competing for the same job.
Lyria 3.5 — Cheapest Per Track, Least Control
$0.08 per song · MP3 44.1 kHz stereo · public preview
Google made Lyria 3.5 callable through the Gemini API on September 4, 2026 (the model itself launched inside Flow Music on July 29). It is a latent-diffusion model over temporal audio latents that accepts text and images and returns a full song — verses, choruses, bridges, vocals or instrumental — plus timed lyrics.
The price is genuinely aggressive. $0.08 for a complete track, priced per song rather than per minute, means a two-minute cue costs the same as a forty-second one. At volume — every reel, every episode intro, every product-demo bed — that arithmetic is hard to beat.
⚠️ What you give up:
- No duration parameter. Length is “a couple of minutes,” guided by the prompt. Google says exact duration “can be influenced,” not set.
- Single-turn generation. No “make the chorus louder.” Re-prompt and regenerate.
- MP3 only. No WAV, no stems.
- No batch, caching, function calling, structured outputs or Live API.
- SynthID watermark on every track.
- Commercial use falls under general Gemini API terms, not a music-specific licence.
Google also publishes no numeric benchmarks for it — the model card reports qualitative gains over Lyria 2 on audio fidelity and lyric prompt adherence, and nothing you can put in a table.
Eleven Music — The One That Fits a Real Pipeline
$0.15 per minute · MP3 or WAV · section-level editing
ElevenLabs charges roughly 4x per two-minute track, and the feature list explains why anyone pays it:
- Exact duration set in milliseconds via
music_length_ms, from 3 seconds to 10 minutes. - Per-section durations through a composition plan — so the intro is 8 seconds because you said 8 seconds.
- Section-level edits after generation: change the sound or lyrics of one part without regenerating everything.
- ~30-second audio reference to steer style toward an existing cue.
- WAV output for anyone who has to master or layer the result.
- Multilingual, and paid plans are stated as cleared for nearly all commercial uses.
If your audio has to land on a cut, this is the only one of the three that can do it deterministically. In a video pipeline that difference is worth more than $0.22 a track.
Suno — Best Tool, Wrong Shape for Automation
Free / $10 / $30 per month · v5.5 flagship
Suno’s current stable flagship is v5.5, released March 26, 2026, with v4, v4.5, v4.5+ and v5 still selectable on paid plans; the free tier runs v4.5-all. Pricing is free with 50 daily credits, Pro at $10/month ($8 billed annually) and Premier at $30/month ($24 billed annually).
For a human sitting down to make music, Suno is the most pleasant of the three — fast generation, a deep back catalogue of model versions to pick from, and a genuinely usable free tier for experimentation.
⚠️ But it is a product, not a backend. If you need a programmatic endpoint that a pipeline calls a thousand times a month, subscription credits and a web app are the wrong shape. Note also the licensing split: paid-plan users own their output; free-tier output is non-commercial.
The Licensing Trap Nobody Reads
All three vendors will tell you something reassuring about rights. None of them can give you the thing people assume they are buying.
The US Copyright Office position is that works generated without meaningful human authorship are not copyrightable. A vendor granting you ownership of an output is a contractual promise between you and that vendor — it is not a registrable copyright you can enforce against a third party who copies your track.
Practical reading: for background scoring, stings and beds, this rarely matters. For anything that is itself the product — a released single, a licensed sync — get actual legal advice, and expect meaningful human authorship to be part of the answer.
How to Choose
| If you need… | Pick |
|---|---|
| Cheapest full tracks at volume | Lyria 3.5 ($0.08/song) |
| Audio that hits exact cut points | Eleven Music (music_length_ms) |
| WAV or masterable output | Eleven Music |
| To revise one section after generating | Eleven Music |
| Image-conditioned generation | Lyria 3.5 (image input) |
| A human-in-the-loop creative tool | Suno (v5.5) |
| A free tier to experiment on | Suno (50 credits/day) |
| Explicit commercial clearance | Eleven Music paid plans |
The default recommendation: use Lyria 3.5 if you are generating a lot of approximate background music cheaply, and Eleven Music the moment duration, format or revision control becomes a requirement. Suno if a person is choosing the take.
Last verified: September 7, 2026.