AI agents · OpenClaw · self-hosting · automation

Quick Answer

Step 5 Preview vs Kimi K3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro vs GLM-5.3

Published:

The four models side by side

Step 5 PreviewKimi K3DeepSeek V4 ProGLM-5.3
MakerStepFun (Shanghai)Moonshot AI (Beijing)DeepSeek (Hangzhou)Z.ai / Zhipu (Beijing)
ReleasedSeptember 20, 2026July 27, 2026 (weights)GA August 13, 2026August 14, 2026
Architecture600B sparse MoE, ~27B activeOpen-weight MoEMoE, 1M ctx743B base, post-trained
Context1M in / 1M outLong context1M in / 384K outLong context, thinking mandatory
Input modalitiesText, image (60/request), videoTextTextText
API price (per MTok)$1.00 / $2.70$3 / $15 (flat)$0.66 / $1.98 off-peak; $1.32 / $3.96 peak$1.40 / $4.40
Cached input95% discount$0.022 off-peak$0.26
Open weightsPromised October 15, 2026YesYesStaged, not shipped at launch
AA measured cost per task$0.71~$2 (K3 Max)

Verified September 20, 2026 against StepFun’s platform docs, Artificial Analysis and the vendors’ pricing pages. Two caveats before quoting: DeepSeek prices double during its peak windows, and Artificial Analysis re-versioned its Intelligence Index in September, so scores from August posts are not comparable with the new 44-point Step 5 number.

What Step 5 Preview actually is

StepFun announced Step 5 Preview on September 20, 2026 and opened its API the same day. The company describes it as “StepFun’s frontier model for production-scale Agent applications,” aimed at programming and professional knowledge work.

The headline specs from StepFun’s own documentation:

  • 600B total parameters, sparse mixture-of-experts, roughly 27B active per token.
  • 1M-token context window, with both maximum input and maximum output listed at 1M tokens.
  • Native text, image and video input. Up to 60 images per request (low or high detail), and MP4/QuickTime/Matroska video under 128 MB, ideally under five minutes.
  • Model ID step-5-preview; OpenAI-compatible chat API.

Pricing is $1.00 per million input tokens and $2.70 per million output tokens, and cached input is discounted 95%. Artificial Analysis calculated a blended $0.51 per million tokens at a 7:2:1 cache-hit/input/output ratio, which made StepFun the cheapest provider of its own model.

On Artificial Analysis’s Intelligence Index, Step 5 Preview scored 44, matching Kimi K3 Max, with an output speed of about 100 tokens per second and a measured $0.71 to run the full evaluation versus roughly $2 for Kimi K3 Max. StepFun’s own demos emphasise long-horizon autonomy: it reports the model optimising H100 GPU kernels unattended for 24 hours to reach 508 TFLOPS.

The open-weights caveat is important. StepFun says the full weights ship on October 15, 2026. As of September 20 the Hugging Face repository contains only a .gitattributes file, so today Step 5 is a hosted API, not a model you can run.

Kimi K3 — the intelligence leader, at a price

Moonshot’s Kimi K3 shipped open weights on July 27, 2026 and has led the open-weight tier on Artificial Analysis since. Its API price is a flat $3 input / $15 output per million tokens — no peak/off-peak games, but the most expensive output of the four, and more than Claude Sonnet 5 ($10). The “K3 Max” configuration is what Artificial Analysis benchmarked against Step 5 at 44 points; it consumed about 2.8x more money to finish the same evaluation.

Choose K3 when you want the highest-capability weights you can self-host and the token bill is not the constraint. See the Kimi K3 local hardware guide.

DeepSeek V4 Pro — the price floor with a schedule

DeepSeek V4 Pro reached GA on August 13, 2026 with 1M context and 384K maximum output. On August 16 DeepSeek moved to peak/off-peak pricing: $0.66 / $1.98 off-peak and exactly double, $1.32 / $3.96, during peak (01:00–04:00 and 06:00–10:00 UTC). Cache hits are $0.022 per million off-peak. For US and European working hours you mostly land off-peak; Asia-Pacific business hours mostly land in peak.

Choose V4 Pro when you can batch work into off-peak windows and want open weights with a 1M context. Do not quote a single flat V4 price — there isn’t one.

GLM-5.3 — the coding-agent specialist

Z.ai’s GLM-5.3 (August 14, 2026) is the same 743B base as GLM-5.2 with new post-training, priced at $1.40 / $4.40 per million tokens with $0.26 cached input. Thinking mode is mandatory. The $18/month Coding Plan and 50% off-peak points (outside 14:00–18:00 UTC+8 weekdays) make it the cheapest way to run a Chinese frontier model inside Claude Code-style agents. Open weights were announced as staged and had not shipped at launch.

Choose GLM-5.3 when the workload is coding agents and you want a subscription rather than per-token metering. See GLM-5.3 vs Opus 5 vs GPT-5.6 Sol for coding.

Head-to-head on the questions developers ask

“Which is cheapest?” List price: DeepSeek V4 Pro off-peak. Measured cost per finished task on Artificial Analysis’s harness: Step 5 Preview at $0.71 is the only one of the four with a published figure this month, and it beat Kimi K3 Max by ~2.8x. Token efficiency, not list price, decided that.

“Which handles the longest documents?” Step 5 Preview and DeepSeek V4 Pro at 1M input. Step 5 uniquely lists 1M output, which matters for agents that write whole repositories or long reports in one pass.

“Which can see images and video?” Only Step 5 Preview, natively. The others are text-only through their first-party APIs.

“Which can I self-host today?” Kimi K3 and DeepSeek V4 Pro. GLM-5.3 and Step 5 are promises for now.

“Which is smartest?” On Artificial Analysis’s current index, Step 5 Preview and Kimi K3 Max tie at 44. Independent numbers for GLM-5.3 and V4 Pro on the re-versioned index were not published as of September 20.

Bottom line

Step 5 Preview is the first Chinese model to combine 1M-context, native video input and sub-$3 output pricing in one API, and it matches Kimi K3 Max on Artificial Analysis’s index at roughly a third of the cost. Until October 15 it is API-only, so teams with a hard self-hosting requirement should stay on Kimi K3 or DeepSeek V4 Pro. For a broader view of the Chinese open-weight race, see DeepSeek vs Moonshot vs Z.ai vs MiniMax.

Sources