AI agents · OpenClaw · self-hosting · automation

Quick Answer

What Is Inkling 2 Small? Price, Benchmarks and Weights

Published:

The short answer

Inkling 2 Small is Thinking Machines Lab’s November 5, 2026 model: a 594B-parameter MoE (17B active) that scores 31 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, costs $0.30 / $1.00 per million tokens on Tinker, and is promised as Apache 2.0 open weights after safety testing. As of November 9, 2026, those weights are not yet public.

Key facts

Inkling 2 Small
DeveloperThinking Machines Lab
AnnouncedNovember 5, 2026
ArchitectureMoE, 594B total / 17B active, image input
Where to run itTinker and Tinker Playground (sampling and fine-tuning)
Price (Tinker)$0.30 input · $0.03 cached · $1.00 output per 1M tokens; training $1.50 (64K) or $3.00 (256K) per 1M
Context on Tinker64K and 256K variants
AA Intelligence Index v5.0.131 (Gemini 3.8 Flash high: 31; Inkling Small: 13)
Output tokens per AA task~150K (Sonnet 5.5 medium ~31K)
Cost per AA task$1.18 (Gemini 3.8 Flash high $7.77, Sonnet 5.5 medium $10.02)
WeightsClosed at launch; Apache 2.0 release planned, date unconfirmed

What changed from Inkling Small

Thinking Machines credits better pre-training efficiency and one large, unified reinforcement-learning run across coding, vision, knowledge work and reasoning. Artificial Analysis measured the jump: AutomationBench-AA from 5% to 46%, FrontierCode 2.0 from 5% to 25%, and hallucination rate on AA-Omniscience down from 61% to 27% — mostly because the model now declines more questions (attempt rate 77% → 53%) rather than knowing much more (accuracy 32% → 34%).

The model is trained to check its own work visually: Thinking Machines demonstrates it building websites, games and 3D scenes and correcting them from screenshots, and says it is set to top DesignArena among open-weight models once the weights ship.

Coding and agent use

Vendor numbers for the coding table: DeepSWE v1.1 72.1%, FrontierCode v2.0 25.4%, SWE-Bench Pro v2 (Hard) 86.3% — strong for its size but behind DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 on DeepSWE (77.0%). Independent results are less flattering on terminal work: 13% on Terminal-Bench 4.0 against 30% for Claude Sonnet 5.5 (medium). Thinking Machines also showcases “autoresearch”: in one run the model post-trained Qwen3.5-4B on Tinker for 4.5 hours and $426 of compute and more than doubled its forecasting score.

The catch is verbosity. At ~150K output tokens per Intelligence Index task, the cheap per-token price does not mean a cheap task. Measure cost per finished job, not per million tokens.

How it compares on price

Its $0.30 / $1.00 list price sits near other efficient open-weight MoEs: Reflection Beam 1.0 from $0.25 / $1.00 on its cheapest host, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash $0.15 / $0.60 off-peak, and well below Kimi K3.1 Pro at $2 / $10 (see our current API prices). The difference is the platform: today Inkling 2 Small runs only on Tinker, which is built for fine-tuning, so its natural buyer is a team that wants to post-train an open model and later download the checkpoint.

Should you use it now?

  • Yes, if you fine-tune on Tinker: you can train on Inkling 2 Small today and download checkpoints when the weights land.
  • Wait, if you need it on your own GPUs or a general inference host — nothing is downloadable yet.
  • Look elsewhere, if you need the strongest terminal coding agent for the money; see Tinker vs OpenAI fine-tuning vs Together AI for the fine-tuning angle and our explainer on the first Inkling model.

Last verified: November 9, 2026.

Sources