What Is Lyria 3.5? Google's $0.08 Song API Explained
The Short Answer
Lyria 3.5 is Google’s flagship music generation model, and as of September 4, 2026 any developer can call it through the Gemini API at $0.08 per full song.
The model is not new — Google launched it inside Flow Music on July 29, 2026. What changed on September 4 is access: it landed in the consumer Gemini app with genre templates and short-or-long track options, and in the Gemini API under the model code lyria-3.5, in public preview.
Underneath, it is a latent-diffusion model over temporal audio latents. It accepts text and images as input and returns an MP3 plus the lyrics it sang.
Full Specification
| Property | Lyria 3.5 |
|---|---|
| Model code | lyria-3.5 (public preview) |
| Inputs | Text and images |
| Outputs | Audio (MP3, 44.1 kHz stereo) + text (lyrics) |
| Structure | Verses, choruses, bridges; vocals or instrumental; timed lyrics |
| Length | ”A couple of minutes”; no published maximum, no duration parameter |
| Price | $0.08 per song, paid tier only — no free tier |
| Editing | Single-turn; no iterative editing of a generated track |
| Safety | Blocks prompts naming an artist’s voice or requesting copyrighted lyrics |
| Watermark | SynthID audio watermark on every track |
| Not supported | Function calling, structured outputs, caching, Live API, batch |
That last row is the one people miss. No batch, no caching, no structured outputs, no Live API — Lyria 3.5 is a plain request/response generation endpoint, not a composable piece of a larger Gemini pipeline.
The Four Limits That Actually Bite
1. There is no duration parameter. You ask for a two-minute song in the prompt and get something around two minutes. Google’s own wording is that exact duration “can be influenced,” not set. For a podcast bed or a reel that has to land on a hard cut, that is a real workflow problem — you generate, measure, and regenerate.
2. Generation is single-turn. There is no “make the chorus louder” round trip. You cannot edit a generated track; you re-prompt and regenerate the whole thing. At $0.08 a shot that is cheap in money and expensive in iteration time.
3. Safety filters are strict by default. Prompts that name a specific artist’s voice or ask for copyrighted lyrics are blocked. This is the right default for a model called by millions, and it is a constraint you design around rather than argue with.
4. Every track is watermarked. SynthID is embedded in all output. That is a feature for provenance and disclosure compliance, and a consideration if your use case assumes unmarked audio.
Price in Context
Lyria 3.5 is priced per song, which is the first thing to notice when comparing it to per-minute models.
| Model | Unit price | Two-minute track |
|---|---|---|
| Lyria 3.5 (Google) | $0.08 per song | $0.08 |
| Lyria 3 Pro (Google, legacy) | $0.08 per song | $0.08 |
| Lyria 3 Clip (Google) | $0.04 per 30s clip | $0.16 (4 clips, stitched) |
| Eleven Music (ElevenLabs) | $0.15 per minute | $0.30 |
At roughly a quarter of ElevenLabs’ price for a two-minute track, Lyria 3.5 looks like an easy win. It is not a like-for-like comparison. Eleven Music returns MP3 or WAV, supports section-level edits after generation, accepts a ~30-second audio reference to steer style, is multilingual, and its paid plans state explicit commercial clearance. Google’s model returns MP3 only, edits nothing after the fact, and leaves commercial terms to the general API terms.
A quarter of the price buys a different product, not a cheaper copy of the same one.
What Google Did Not Publish
No numeric benchmarks. The model card describes human and automated evaluation across music quality and aesthetics, vocal quality, audio fidelity, and prompt adherence — and reports the results qualitatively: gains over Lyria 2 on audio fidelity and on lyric prompt adherence. There is no published score, no head-to-head, no MOS figure.
If you are choosing between music models in September 2026, there is no vendor-published number to compare. You have to run your own listening test on your own prompts. Budget for that.
Who Should Use It
| If you… | Verdict |
|---|---|
| Need cheap background scoring at volume | Yes — $0.08/song is the cheapest full-song API here |
| Need exact-length tracks | No — no duration parameter |
| Need WAV or stems | No — MP3 only |
| Need to revise a generated track | No — single-turn only |
| Need explicit commercial music licensing | Check — falls under general Gemini API terms |
| Need image-conditioned music | Yes — image input is supported, unusually |
Image input is the underrated feature. Feeding a keyframe or a brand board in alongside the text prompt is a genuinely different steering mechanism from the text-plus-audio-reference approach ElevenLabs uses.
Last verified: September 7, 2026.