AI agents · OpenClaw · self-hosting · automation

Quick Answer

Claude Fable 5.2 vs Mythos 5.2 vs Opus 5.5: Which to Use

Published:

The short answer

Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 are one model with two safety settings. Pick Opus 5.5 by default, Fable 5.2 for the hardest long-running work, and Mythos 5.2 only if you do verified security or biology research. Anthropic released both on November 9, 2026:

  • Claude Opus 5.5 — the default for most coding and knowledge tasks. $4 input / $20 output per million tokens.
  • Claude Fable 5.2 — for ambitious, open-ended technical work: multi-day agent runs, large migrations, hard reasoning. $8 / $40, available to everyone.
  • Claude Mythos 5.2 — the same model without most cyber and biology blocks, for organizations in Anthropic’s verification programs. $8 / $40.

The comparison

Prices from Anthropic’s pricing page and benchmark figures from Anthropic’s launch post, read November 10, 2026. Scores are each model’s highest available effort, with safeguards on unless noted.

Fable 5.2Mythos 5.2Opus 5.5Fable 5.1
Model IDclaude-fable-5-2claude-mythos-5-2claude-opus-5-5claude-fable-5-1
Input / output per MTok$8 / $40$8 / $40$4 / $20$10 / $50
Cache read$0.20$0.20$0.20$0.25
Batch$4 / $20$4 / $20$2 / $10$5 / $25
Fast mode$16 / $80$16 / $80 (verified orgs)$8 / $40—
Who can use itAll customersVerified organizationsAll customersAll customers
FrontierCode 2.049.1%—45.5%32.4%
FrontierSWE v269.9%—62.3%56.3%
OSWorld 2.1 (partial)89.3%—87.2%83.5%
Humanity’s Last Exam (tools)74.2%—67.7%65.6%
CVE Rediscoveryblocked89.6%81.3% (no safeguards)—

All three current models share a 1M-token context window and 128K max output. For other vendors’ prices see our current API prices.

What changed from Fable 5.1

  • 20% cheaper. Input and output dropped from $10/$50 to $8/$40; cache reads from $0.25 to $0.20.
  • Up to 30% faster output, per Anthropic, and fewer tokens per task at the default medium effort.
  • Big jumps on agentic work. FrontierCode 2.0 rose from 32.4% to 49.1% and the Remote Labor Index from 17.9% to 41.3%. Fable 5.2 beats GPT-6 Astra (65.5%) and Gemini 4 Carbon (61.2%) on FrontierSWE v2 in Anthropic’s table, but Gemini 4 Carbon still leads AutomationBench (53.9% vs 51.4%).
  • Fewer false blocks. Anthropic says Fable 5.2’s cyber and biology classifiers are as strict as Fable 5.1’s but refuse fewer harmless requests. When a request is blocked, Claude answers with Opus 4.8 (cyber) or Opus 5 (biology) instead.
  • Breaking API changes. Edited conversation history now returns a 400 error on every account, and the old computer_20251124 tool is rejected outside Bedrock. Our Fable 5.2 migration guide covers each one.

When each model is the right pick

Opus 5.5 — the default. Anthropic’s launch post recommends starting here and moving up or down as needed. At half Fable’s price with 87–93% of its scores on most coding benchmarks, Opus 5.5 wins on cost for everyday pull requests, chat assistants and RAG.

Fable 5.2 — when Opus fails your evals. The gains are largest on long, open-ended work: Anthropic had a 1,000-agent team of Fable 5.2 formalize Fermat’s Last Theorem in 30 hours, where Opus 5.5 finished 26% in 18 hours. Fable 5.2 can also act as an advisor to cheaper models or an orchestrator that hands subtasks to Haiku or Sonnet, which keeps the bill down.

Mythos 5.2 — security and biology research only. Anthropic says Mythos 5.2 found 10.2% more vulnerabilities than Opus 5.5 and 14.4% more than Mythos 5.1 on its internal CVE Rediscovery test. Fable 5.2 blocks most penetration testing, exploit generation and binary vulnerability work, so a security team needs Mythos or Claude Security. See our explainer on Mythos trusted access for how the program works.

Limits to know

  • No zero data retention. Fable 5.2 and Mythos 5.2 require 30-day data retention unless Anthropic expressly authorizes otherwise.
  • Subscription caps. During the launch promotion, Fable counts toward up to 50% of weekly usage limits on Pro plans and standard Team seats; eligible plans also get one to three Fable usage resets.
  • Benchmarks are vendor-reported. Treat the table as Anthropic’s numbers until independent evaluations land.

Last verified: November 10, 2026.

Sources